CO129-394 - Governor Sir May & Public Offices - 1912 [12] — Page 204

bil form Fender

H. Fander had been compell examinied it

tem should have

¿

Amber

this tent provision included in the

Apperon payment, drearing that the loft comet

avoid H. conclusion that

much

나

delay difficulty

4. delay

might have been presented if the Fisher had taken

A

Expricera

had succeeded w

de duties as

maintaining

Excention

better

relation with the Architects. Add that some

H. P.W.D..

sealed in the rgansertion of

mber it is quite clean that

be it in under Head II Mur referred

Weakness in

the itam

thany

1

should have been thought out beforehand -

hat the distability f

i als

4. Clock Tower (p2q

ened by ought, whether in fort it was or not, to have

to H. Directors notic

been bought

9

a free

RAP

1572

A&C

24

It has been a wretched busmen L

hos produced come Caustic Commenti

for from unofficials.

26

Add that the papers do not reflect any credit on the P. 6.D.

Conte ammixed,

they

to abaal above

My Fisher's desire for an Ir

interers to dionys the question

2.13

Harcourt

This is not w!

Justice

? 200

my

Fisher, but

سلامت

Hong Kong Engineer who has bee adversely criticised in connexion with the

Wilding of the New Post Office. I will reply, if que affure, that

است پر

you

but that

approve,

ཀ༩༩

cannot

See

Igents

will Ve

you

pad

10 consider

make in

may

writing on the subject

}

3

and

statement which he

he. Robinson.

HAB.

28.1.14.

Jes of 28.1.14

better be attached to 3159/12.13. Hap. 29.1.14 please see the correspondence. It had

meign Jan)